Effective July 19, 2026
FlowVideo editorial and AI content policy
Our goal is to publish material a creator, search engine or AI answer system can trace back to a dated source, visible product contract or reproducible test.
Evidence hierarchy
We prefer provider documentation, official notices, the live FlowVideo adapter and billing code, then reproducible product tests. Third-party summaries may provide context but do not override a primary source.
Hands-on tests
A model comparison must record the prompt, inputs, settings, run date, cost, raw output URL or archived file, and failures. We do not promote a result-only highlight reel as a controlled comparison.
AI assistance
AI may help outline, translate or edit content. A named FlowVideo editor remains responsible for checking claims, links, product availability, costs and dates before publication.
Commercial relationships
Provider availability does not imply endorsement. Sponsored or affiliate relationships must be disclosed on the page. FlowVideo currently labels its own product workflows and upstream provider sources separately.
Corrections
Material errors are corrected in place and added to the public changelog. A correction keeps the original publication date, adds a modification date and explains what changed.
Review cadence
Model price and capability facts are reviewed monthly; shutdown notices and material product changes are reviewed as soon as they are known. Evergreen guides are reviewed at least every six months.
Contact the editorial team
Send a correction request with the page URL, disputed statement and supporting source to support@flowvideo.ai.